Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Olympics opening ceremony

zoo
Olympics opening ceremony
July 28, 2012 04:51PM
Song snippets that were included in the "Four decades of British music" bit:

OMD - Enola Gay
Specials - A Message To Rudy
Jam - Going Underground
Blur - Song 2

Others, of course. Most were snippets, but "Going Underground" actaully included at least 90 seconds or so.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 28, 2012 06:44PM
Is it just me or were those opening ceremonies an ugly, chaotic, incomprehensible mess? And the music ceremony was by far the worst part of it. I was yearning for them to just pick a song and let it play or let Dizzee Rascal do his bombastic thang without all the cuts every few seconds. What on Earth did the queen make of all that?

I didn't exactly enjoy the endless celebration of the National Heslth Service but I wish the idiotic tea party types took note of a country that lives its health care system do much, they not only defend it tooth and nail from austerity cuts, but celebrate it in song. Imagine living in a country like that.

I do enjoy the parade of nations however mostly because I am a geography buff and love to see the delegations from the tiny countries and hear bob Costas drop a factoid or two for each. Did you know in Finland, parking fines are proportional to income? What a damn good idea! Plus, the team from Cameroon had it going on! Amazing outfits! Hope they medal
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 28, 2012 07:35PM
It was pretty sobering seeing the reactions of a sizable majority of the athletes when McCartney was wheeled out and he tried to get them to participate in a singalong of "Hey Jude." Their faces mostly registered indifference or incomprehension, which really hammered home the fact that the Brits could've put dear old 90-something Vera Lynn on the stage last night to warble "The White Cliffs of Dover" and she would've been just as relevant to the 2012 crop of Olympians as Sir Paul singing "Hey Jude" was.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 28, 2012 07:35PM
"Is it just me or were those opening ceremonies an ugly, chaotic, incomprehensible mess? And the music ceremony was by far the worst part of it. "

No, it wasn't just you. Should've had Terry Gilliam instead of Danny Boyle if they wanted that kind of chaotic weirdness done well. (I'll take the Specials and be done with the rest.)

I did learn, however, that Andorra is a country and not just the troublesome mother-in-law on Bewitched. What's that, Brad? Oh, it's "Endora" (the mother, not the country).

She's from the Pyrenees, you know. Oh, wait, no--that's the country.

Meanwhile, Michael Phelps seems to have learned that staying up all night smoking pot and playing Halo is not a good training strategy for an olympian.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 29, 2012 01:29PM
Quote

Should've had Terry Gilliam

Fun trivia fact: Gilliam was JK Rowlings' personal choice to direct the Harry Potter movies and he was raring to do it, but the studio was too horrified at the thought to even consider it. I would love to see what he would've done with them.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 31, 2012 07:30AM
nosepail wrote:

> Did you know in Finland, parking fines are proportional to
> income? What a damn good idea!

Finland isn't the only country to assess a proportional traffic fine, which is known as a "day-fine" or "unit fine": Sweden, Denmark, Croatia, Germany, Switzerland, Mexico and Macao also use a similar system:

See: day-fine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-fine

One Swiss dude (a repeat offender) got fined 182,000 Swiss francs--almost $300,000--for driving his red Ferrari Testarossa at 85mph in a 50mph zone:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jan/07/swiss-record-speeding-fine

Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 29, 2012 12:14AM
I liked the part at the very beginning, where they were doing aerial shot/steadicam thing @ 4X speed. While we were watching it, my wife asked me who Danny Boyle is. "Well, he made the movie Trainspotting. And Slumdog Millionaire. And that movie with Ewan McGregor and Cameron Diaz that we almost walked out of that time (A Life Less Ordinary, 1997).

I doubt there's anyone on this board who's not a serious Anglophile. From a culture standpoint, they have Shakespeare and The Beatles. Great Britain wins.

They could've just spent an hour pointing cameras at St. Paul's Cathedral, The Radcliffe Camera (Oxford), the York City Walls and Liz Hurley, and I would've been content.

"Enola Gay," while a personal favorite, seems like an odd choice.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 29, 2012 01:27AM
"From a culture standpoint, they have Shakespeare and The Beatles. Great Britain wins."

We've got Moby-Dick, Elvis, and Dylan.

Repent, Jermoe.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
July 29, 2012 08:45PM
Quote

We've got Moby-Dick, Elvis, and Dylan.

Ahh, but when the King wasn't rehearsing or exercising he'd unwind by watching Monty Python on up to three televisions at once.

Advantage: Britain.
Re: Olympics opening ceremony
August 04, 2012 06:28AM
final score britannia 2- nil

one goal each per half from Bonzo the Dog and the Arctic Monkeys.



Post Edited (08-04-12 03:30)
One of these things is not like the others
July 29, 2012 08:40PM
And not only Shakespeare and the Beatles.

As the promo ads for Olympic coverage on Canada's largest television network remind us:

"From Chaucer to Coldplay,
From Shakespeare to the Beatles...."
Re: One of these things is not like the others
July 30, 2012 01:21PM
From "Chaucer to Coldplay..." Eek.

"From Rowling to Radiohead..." (she's Scottish, but that only matters to Scots)
"From Milton to Madness..."

Dizzee Rascal...anyone else unsure what the deal is? I feel like that NPR intern listening to It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back...
Re: One of these things is not like the others
July 30, 2012 01:52PM
Jermoe,

I had to look up your reference,, but I found the excruciatingly ignorant evaluation of PE you mentioned. The idiocy of the following comments is apparent:

Quote

"....But when "Don't Believe the Hype" comes on, I'm disoriented — I know I'm listening to one of the most acclaimed rap records of all time, but nothing grabs me and sucks me in. Chuck D.'s unvarnished vocals sit front and center in the mix, accompanied only by percussion that, to me, sounds thin and funk guitar samples that, frankly, I find cartoonish.

To me, Chuck D.'s legendary flow also comes across like a caricature. His syncopation strikes me as strange, foreign — and when he does reach for melody, like in the opening verses of "Night of the Living Baseheads," it ascends harshly like the bark of a drill sergeant. It's rough, rugged, built like a tank — and I'm coming at it expecting a Bentley.

I think it's telling that my favorite track on It Takes a Nation is "Show 'Em Whatcha Got," a short interlude with few lyrics. Absent is any narrative development; instead, faceless vocals crawl from beneath cobwebs of radio static and vinyl crackle to join Chuck D. and Flavor Flav's chopped chants to remind us that "freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes."

"Show 'Em" is, in its own way, a pleasant surprise: its ambient, referential construction reminds me more of eerie, nocturnal electronic music perfect for post-club comedowns – like that of UK dubstep producer Burial – than mainstream contemporary hip-hop.

But Public Enemy and I are on the same page only briefly: immediately following "Show 'Em" is the alarmingly dated rap-rock fusion of "She Watch Channel Zero?!" I simply cannot get past the bizarre, jolting juxtaposition of bludgeoning, Metallica-style guitar riffs and Flavor Flav's ebullient rhymes. I find myself more inclined to laugh than dance.

As a whole, It Takes A Nation leaves me similarly perplexed. But what Public Enemy does offer me is the context to understand how much hip-hop — and I — have changed since our childhoods. Two years ago, I wouldn't have even thought to give It Takes A Nation a listen, much less spend weeks processing and writing about my reaction to it. 10 years ago, very few would have pointed to Toronto as a hub of hip-hop creativity.

Ultimately, I have no regrets leaving It Takes A Nation on what is now an entirely metaphorical shelf. I'll gladly say thank-you, but given the choice, I'm going to blast Drake's infectiously triumphant mp3s every time

PE production: thin and cartoonish? Chuck D.'s flow a caricature? Alarmingly dated rap-rock fusion? Drake over Chuck? This youth is hopeless - forget about him.

(I find Drake particularly loathsome and unlistenable.)
Re: One of these things is not like the others
July 30, 2012 02:00PM
I am not a fan of Dizzee. Like MIA or The Streets, He brings a form of internationlist grimey bombast that I can only take in very small doses, and mostly find unlistenable. But I do love this song. Billy Squier rules!



Post Edited (07-30-12 11:20)
Re: One of these things is not like the others
July 30, 2012 02:21PM
"I am not a fan of Dizzee."

Well, the NME ranks that track ahead of the Beatles (in music released since 1952). [www.nme.com]

It's the list to end and obliterate all lists. A giant mushroom cloud where there was any shred of argument or credibility.
Re: One of these things is not like the others
July 30, 2012 03:13PM
Quote

I feel like that NPR intern listening to It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back...

Boy, NPR interns are turning out to be an even more annoying breed of human than the phrase "NPR intern" automatically suggests.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login